Why Citizen's of the American Constituion

In today's world, it is imperative to be clear and steadfast relative to the importance of adhering to the Constitution for the united States of America, with special emphasis on key amendments like the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth. The primary highlights are that all government officials are bound by oaths to unconditionally operate within their limited, delegated authority as per the Constitution and never violate the people’s rights.
The Constitution limits the government's authority to what is specified within its clauses. It goes without saying, the significance of citizens actively participating in discussions about laws that affect them is paramount, and the effectiveness of successful legal strategies grounded in constitutional principles utilized without exception, leads to significant court victories such as in New Mexico. Defend your rights, be knowledgeable about the law, and engage in actions to safeguard yourselves by asserting the full power of the Constitution. Protect your rights and challenge any government overreach or infringement using Constitutional authority.

This website is established pursuant to the Constitution for these united States of America, and any replicas thereof, in particular, the Bill of Rights, and specifically, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Amendments. Any public officer or official in any government position who has previously taken an oath or acts under agent-principal oath, who acts in opposition to this web site, in any manner, acts in opposition to, including but not limited to, the following: (1) his/her oath; (2) The Constitution, all powers thereof and all Rights guaranteed therein; (3) The Public Trust. By his/her own actions, such officer has invoked the self-executing sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment, vacates his office, his actions, rulings and authority are null and void, and he forfeits all benefits of his former office, including salary and pension.

“We, the People” is not just an expression. It is the phrase that our founding fathers chose to define the true Sovereigns of this Nation, namely, We, the People of America, from whom ALL political power is derived. We then delegated limited Constitutional authority to government to serve us, pursuant to oaths taken, as required by the Supremacy Clauses, Sections 2 and 3 of Article VI. All legislative power is vested in Congress. We have no kings in this Nation. The limited, delegated authority to government is found in Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1 through 18. All that is stated therein is the full and ONLY extent of its authority. That which is not authorized by the Constitution is prohibited by the Constitution.

In today’s America, because of false education, teachings, political maneuvering, propaganda, and for countless other reasons, many people think that it is the People who must serve government. That is not how our Nation was created, and that is not the law. Please understand this: Our government, created by the People, serves us. It does so pursuant to the Constitution, oaths taken to it, and the limited powers delegated by it to government. That is the extent of government’s legal and lawful power. Anything beyond that is usurpation of power, without authority, insurrection and sedition, and possibly, treason. Our Constitution is now and has been, for many years, the only thing that has kept this Nation from outright tyranny. Our duty is to protect it so it can protect us.

All laws created by Congress for the American People must be Constitutionally compliant or they are null and void, without force or effect, whatsoever. Since the “law” was created by the People for the People and affects the People, then, obviously, the People have the Right to discuss, deal with and in the law which was created for and which affects them. If government, which was created by the People, denies the People involvement and participation in laws created by and for them, then that government lacks Constitutional authority to do so and those laws from which the People are excluded no longer apply to or pertain to the People.

The Constitution, as the Supreme Law of the land, affects ALL the People, thus, it is obvious that the People have not only the Right, but also the duty and obligation to participate in and openly discuss, among themselves, the “law” and OUR Constitution. If one does not know that he has Rights, then he has none. People said that tyranny could not happen in Germany, Spain and Chile, to name just a few. It did. Those people had a level of sophistication and Rights that they thought would continue. They did not, because those people got careless and let it happen. It would be a tragic insult to the millions of Americans who died, were wounded or severely maimed in the numerous wars America fought in the name of American freedom for us to allow our own government and courts to deny the very Rights for which they bravely gave their last full measure of devotion to their Country.

Everyone in this Nation has the RIGHT to his/her opinion. We welcome all opinions. Although we may not agree with all expressed opinions, we, as Constitutionalists, support your RIGHT to say anything you want. Our “opinions” are based in and supported by fact, law and the Constitution. What we openly present and discuss on this website is not, and is not to be construed, as “legal advice”. As stated, the “law” is for the People, and, as such, the People have the RIGHT to participate in and discuss, among themselves, all law that affects them, and if any government were to deny the People this Right, then the People are not subject to the “law” created for them and from which they are unconstitutionally excluded by that government which acts in opposition to the Constitution.

OUR CONSTITUTIONAL GROUP HAS WON WELL OVER 250 VICTORIES IN NEW MEXICO COURTS BY USING CONSTITUTIONALLY BASED PROCEDURES AND METHODS

The Constitutional group has been active in New Mexico for approximately five years, and members of that group have won well over 250 victories — a near 100% victory record — in New Mexico courts. The few lost in lower courts are won in higher courts. We win our cases because we know the CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND, and, by and through certain Constitutionally based methods and pleadings we file with the courts, we hold all government officers, judges and officials to it and to their limited, delegated Constitutional authority. Remember, if any action is not authorized by the Constitution, it is prohibited.

Many Americans will say that the government and courts will no longer recognize the Constitution and, because of this, there is no sense in their using it. Please remember that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land, and ALL public officers, judges and politicians have sworn oaths, and are bound thereby, to support and uphold the Constitution. Those public officers who deny the Constitution commit insurrection and sedition to it and, further, commit treason against the Sovereign Citizens.
It is the responsibility of the American People to oppose all enemies, foreign and domestic. Any public officer who has previously taken an oath to the Constitution and then denies the Constitution, its powers and Rights guaranteed therein, is a domestic enemy and must be exposed as such.
The American People must begin to recognize their powers guaranteed within the Constitution, and use those powers against any public officers who openly and covertly oppose their Rights and their law. You can be assured that the politicians will, obviously, NOT do this for you, so personal responsibility is mandatory.

Mark Twain once said: “In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man — brave — hated — scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot.” The overwhelming majority of American People have been asleep, disinterested, too busy or too timid to take action. That recognition could spur them to awaken to their personal responsibilities, become that Patriot, and take effective action against those who would ruin this great Nation.

In New Mexico, we and our group are hated and scorned by all government and courts, as will be more fully explained later. This is because we demand our Rights, get them, win, and we DO NOT FEAR THEM. They fear us. One of our favorite quotes from Jefferson is: “When People fear their government, there is tyranny. When government fears the People, there is liberty.” What we have lawfully done in New Mexico you and other Patriots like you can do in your own communities, cities, towns and states and create beneficial changes for everyone.

This web site has many links for different purposes which may suit your individual interests or needs. The Current Court Victories link will explain some of what we consider to be major victories obtained against corrupt systems, corrupt opponents, corrupt judges and corrupt courts. Presented below are four current court orders from various New Mexico courts.

These represent victories achieved under extremely difficult circumstances and against great odds. As many of you know, government and courts do not like to lose to what they refer to as pro-se litigants, who are, in actuality, American Citizens, claiming and exercising their Constitutional Rights in their courts. The system likes to keep People wrapped up in its corrupt little game, and if a Citizen speaks for himself in court, unrepresented by an attorney, then the system cannot control that Citizen through their system, which includes, in most cases, your attorney, who is unlikely to actually oppose the system for you since he depends upon that system for his livelihood.

A favorite gimmick of government and the courts is to dismiss cases brought by pro-se plaintiffs, because of some minor point or technicality, usually not Constitutionally based in law or case law, and ignore all the vast evidence and pleadings that will support the Citizen’s lawful positions. This dismisses a case for an insignificant, usually unrelated and unspecific position, while the main points are never considered. If the pro-se is a defendant, the judge usually finds against him/her for, again, some minor infraction, again, not Constitutionally based. The pleadings of the pro-se litigant and his evidence file are rarely considered or read and his case very seldom gets before a jury, a complete denial of his Constitutionally guaranteed Rights and due process.
In fact, the judge’s job is to make sure that the case never gets before a jury. The entire matter is lost because of the minor, insignificant point by which the judge reduces the most important aspects of the case to the least important consideration. In so-doing, as previously stated, the vast amount of evidence presented by pro-se litigants in support of their cases is rarely, if ever, heard. Fortunately, our Constitutionally based methods have proven extremely effective against this outrageous and corrupt denial of the Constitution and due process.

We support everything we say, do and present in court with fact, law and evidence to uphold our lawful positions. This is imperative. A position supported by fact and law is legally and lawfully solid. That position which is not so based is frivolous and can be quickly dismissed as such. What Edwards presented was fully verifiable, and anything a Citizen does before the court should be the same. If your positions are based in fact and law and supported by evidence, while your opponent, whether a government, institution or corporation is based in fraud, then it will be very difficult for the judge to rule against fact and law and uphold fraud.

The vast majority of judges will automatically oppose the unrepresented Citizen who speaks for himself. This, as stated, is a challenge to his authority and “his” court, which, of course, properly belongs to the People. If the Citizen’s opponent is government, corporate or institutional, as was Edwards’, the judge usually, and automatically, takes their position over the Citizen. This is when the Citizen must display proper, lawful knowledge and actions, and have the proper methods to remind the judge of his assigned duties and his opponent of the truth.
It has been our experience that when most judges and opponents encounter such an informed and legally well armed and prepared Citizen, they fold. All the various tricks of the trade they employ fall away in the stark reality of the law and the truth. Few judges are willing to outright defy the law presented by a Citizen who knows the law and defend a corporate or government position based in fraud. The judge could be in personal jeopardy. However, if the Citizen does not know the law, his Rights guaranteed therein and present positions based in fact and law, that judge will usually find for the corporate interests.

One of the court’s tricks of the trade is not to allow the Citizen’s case to get before a jury by dismissing it on some trumped-up fraud. The court and opposition realizes that a knowledgeable, unrepresented Citizen, who speaks for himself, before a jury, is dangerous to their positions. The jury will usually see the truth of the matter, no matter how hard the opposition tries to hide it. Our Constitutional methods require the court to honor the Constitutionally guaranteed Right of trial by jury, as well as honor all other Rights guaranteed in the Constitutions, federal and state.
After all, the Constitution is the law of the land, to which the judge has sworn an oath. To deny the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the Constitutions is insurrection, sedition, and treason against the Sovereign People, and dangerous to the judge. When a Citizen properly presents his case, as did Edwards, many times the judge and/or the opposition will clearly see how the case is based, know that they are basically up against the law, and find reasons to either withdraw or find for the Citizen. However, in some cases, as in Edwards’ case, they will commit every fraud in the book to the very end, then withdraw. The Citizen has to be fully prepared for either situation.

For your own edification, you might inquire of your own local and federal courts systems and obtain printed information from them concerning the number of pro-se cases that came before them in the past five years, and how many of them prevailed or even got to a jury. You will be extremely surprised. For the most part, these records are not kept, and if they are, not released to the public. The reason is that few, if any, pro se litigants win in local courts, and fewer, if any, win in federal courts. This is a national disgrace. You might call local newspapers and have the legal editors or other interested reporters inquire for themselves. It would be a major scoop for them.

EFFECTIVE METHODS AND ACTIONS PRODUCE PRECEDENT-SETTING COURT VICTORIES FOR THE PEOPLE

The first court order presented below pertains to METRIS v, Edwards, case no. 2003-188-CV, heard in New Mexico state district court. This was brought against Edwards by Metris, the parent of a large national credit card bank, which has been previously accused of fraud, and settled out of court. Edwards used Constitutionally based documents in her case and because of these methods, the Plaintiff, Metris, knew they lost, failed to prosecute the case for ten months, their attorneys submitted a Motion to Withdraw, and the hostile man acting as “judge”, instead of dismissing the case, according to law, continued it, without authority, yet Edwards STILL WON.

These Constitutionally based methods protected her Rights guaranteed in the Constitution and required the judge and public officers to uphold those Rights. If a Citizen does not claim and exercise his Rights, he will not have them upheld.
Our methods, as used by Edwards, are further explained in the link Current Court Victories and may be of assistance to you in your court battles against the organized corruption in most of our courts. Although we have not done extensive research, it seems that this case is precedent setting and one of the few, if any, victories in state district court by a Citizen who spoke for herself, unrepresented by attorney, against a national banking corporation.

The second court order below dismisses a case, with prejudice, brought by the Santa Fe, New Mexico police department against a Citizen who voluntarily surrendered his “driver’s license”, his registration and insurance to the state Motor Vehicle Department and freed himself from the fraudulent, deceptive and unilateral contract imposed upon him, under color of law, and one lacking full disclosure. Several months later he was arrested, his truck confiscated, and criminal charges were filed against him. Because of the Constitutional methods used, the tow truck operator, who had been warned by the police not to return the truck until the Citizen produced a driver’s license, registration and insurance, returned the truck to the Citizen, against the firm orders of the police.

If the laws, rules and regulations with which this Citizen was charged were valid and enforceable, then the case would not have been dismissed, with prejudice, and the Citizen would have been fined and/or jailed. He was not. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few cases in the Country in which an unrepresented Citizen has prevailed in court against the massive fraud being perpetrated upon Citizens throughout this Nation, by the licensing, registration and insurance fraud being mandated by government, in defiance of the Constitution and without Constitutional authority.

Cases three and four below pertain to two Citizens who were denied their Constitutionally guaranteed Rights to trial by jury, which they requested, by Motion, in lower court, which used deception and fraud to deprive them of their Rights. These Citizens appealed to the New Mexico state district court and used our Constitutionally based methods to achieve victory against a government that, without authority, unlawfully denied them their guaranteed Rights and due process of law. As you can see, the court orders dismissing the cases are based on Constitutional grounds, which is extremely rare. Courts usually use grounds other than Constitutional reasons as a basis for dismissing a case.

These four cases and all of the other referenced victories were achieved by and through the Constitutionally based methods we employ as Citizens, with nearly unanimous success. The Constitution is the Law of the Land that protects your Rights, and our methods are based in and supported by that Constitution, to which all public officers have taken oaths. For more details on these cases and methods, please click on to the Current Court Victories link. The four court orders follow.

Margy Flynn’s Law Suit Against the City of Las Vegas, NM & Officials

METRIS CASE

FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF SAN MIGUEL
STATE OF NEW MEXICO

METRIS COMPANIES LLP, PLAINTIFF,

VS.

NO. 03-188-CV

MARGARET EDWARDS, DEFENDANT.

ORDER

This case having been set for a trial on the merits on February 8, 2005 at the hour of 9:00 a.m. pursuant to the Amended Notice of Hearing filed on October 28,2004, and defendant having appeared at 9:00 a.m. ready to proceed to trial and the court having waited until 9:30 a.m. for plaintiff to appear, but plaintiff not appearing; and the court being fully advised and informed in the premises,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by the court that this case is dismissed.

DATED this 8th day of February, 2005.



CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I hereby certify that on the 8th day of February, 2005, a copy of the foregoing order was mailed to Edward Connelly, Metris Company, Suite 300, 16430 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85254 and Margaret Edwards, 739 Dalbey Drive, Las Vegas, NM 8770l.

Roberta J. Sena. TCAM

***********************************************************

STATE OF NEW MEXICO

CITY OF SANTA FE

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT

CITY OF SANTA FE

v.

No. L-201-TR-20048 943

Thomas Hyland,Defendant

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

The complaint filed in this case is dismissed with prejudice.

Art Michaels

Prosecutor or complainant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 15 day of Jan. 2005, this notice was either mailed to the Defendant or his attorney, or given to the Defendant or his attorney in person.

Art Michaels

Prosecutor or complainant

Note: The signature of prosecutor Art Michaels did not scan, so we used italics to state his name.

****************************************************************

FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT STATE OF NEW MEXICO

COUNTY OF GUADALUPE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

PLAINTIFF,

v.

No. 2003 –05 – LR

MARIO LUCERO,

DEFENDANT.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This matter came before the Court on February 19, 2004. The Court finds that Defendant made a timely demand for trial by jury in the Guadalupe County Magistrate Court and the Defendant was denied his right to trial by jury.

IT IS ORDERED that Uniform Traffic Citation No. 3850742-2, issued June 10 2003, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.



EUGENIO S. MATHIS

District Judge

Cc:_Ricardo Berry,ADA

Mario Lucero, 919 3rd Street, Las Vegas, NM 87701

Hon. James Moncayo. 601 Parker Avenue. Santa Rosa. NM 87701

*******************************************************

FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT STATE OF NEW MEXICO

COUNIY OF GUADALUPE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

PLAINTIFF,

v. No. 2003 –06 – LR

MARIO PEREZ,

DEFENDANT.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This matter came before the Court on February 19, 2004. The Court finds that Defendant made a timely demand for trial by jury in the Guadalupe County Magistrate Court and the Defendant was denied his right to trial by jury.

IT IS ORDERED that Uniform Traffic Citation No. 3850742-2, issued June 10 2003, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.



EUGENIO S. MATHIS

District Judge

Cc:_Ricardo Berry,ADA

Mario Lucero, 919 3rd Street, Las Vegas, NM 87701

Hon. James Moncayo. 601 Parker Avenue. Santa Rosa. NM 87701

Please Donate!

If you would like, make a donation to keep this important work going!

Send a check or money order via snail mail to:

Jack and Margy Flynn

c/o 19 Mishemokwa Drive

Cherokee Village, Arkansas [72529]

Phone/Fax: 207-404-9093

Email: jackandmargy@protonmail.com

THANK YOU!

Jack & Margy Flynn

US Constitution & Bill of Rights

If you have never read the original American Constitution, and don't understand the American Constitution of 1787, we highly advise you to start here first before going through the course.

We have both versions available, audiobook and written format so you can follow along. They are verbatim exactly identical. good luck and tell everybody it's time to take our rights back. Join the course 1000% free of charge.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Please Donate!

If you would like, make a donation to keep this important work going!

Send a check or money order via snail mail to:

Jack and Margy Flynn

c/o 19 Mishemokwa Drive

Cherokee Village, Arkansas [72529]

Phone/Fax: 207-404-9093

Email: jackandmargy@protonmail.com

THANK YOU!

Jack & Margy Flynn

Plan to Save America Videos

Enclosed herein are links to a two-hour video we did almost four years ago regarding the Affidavit process. This video gets into the depth of this process and the power and authority of our original organic Constitution, as expressed through the Affidavit. This is good information for people who know little to nothing about the type of Affidavit we use. The language below is what we have sent to people regarding our Affidavit process. The video begins with an explanation of the dire problems that are current in America, today, and how they are adversely affecting everyone in our society at every level, except for the uber rich, of course.

As most of you know, our beloved America and our Constitutional Republic have been taken over by an insidious evil that, if not lawfully stopped by the people, will eradicate our American system and our Constitutional Republic and replace them with total eternal tyranny. As most of you have seen, the machinery of all governments in this country, federal, state, county and local, are operating under communism, with impunity, in direct opposition to and violation of our Constitutions, national and state since the American society has not lawfully stopped this egregious, unlawful treason.

The people are America, the people are the de jure government, and it is up to the people, as an American society, to band together in common purpose and objective to lawfully stop the pernicious evil that has totally taken over our lawful forms of government. As mentioned before, the government will never stop the problems it deliberately created, so now, it is is squarely in the hands of the American people to stand upon the POWER AND AUTHORITY OF these Constitutions and courageously and lawfully put an end to this treasonous tyranny, which only the people can stop. All "governments" in America are being operated by DOMESTIC ENEMIES, and as Thomas Jefferson so wisely said, it is our duty to oppose all enemies of this Republic, both foreign and DOMESTIC. The DOMESTIC ENEMIES are deeply embedded within and control all aspects of all governments in this country, so, obviously, we cannot look to these traitors to solve America's pressing problems and expect them to end their blatant treason and tyranny. ONLY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN DO THIS.

Below are several links to a video we did in late September of 2020 to discuss constitutional solutions to the constitutional violations being committed, with impunity, by virtually every government--federal, state, county and local-- operating throughout this nation. As always seems to occur whenever we are trying to get out important information to the people, there were a number of strange, weird technical problems that came up out of the blue, repeatedly, much to the distress of our "techie" student who was doing the filming.

Please pass this email on to others who love our country and our Constitutions, realize that America is in grave danger from this increasingly aggressive communist insurrection and want to take lawful means to stop it.

Because of the disruptive technical oddities we encountered, the video had to be done in two parts. The first part is about an hour and the second part is divided into three segments. The first two segments run about a half hour each and the last one is only 2 minutes.

Constitutional Affidavits

[Scroll to bottom for Affidavits]

Constitutional Affidavits to Public Officers and Candidates for Office Below are templates for Affidavits to be presented to existing public officers and to candidates for public office.

As you likely know, virtually all public officers in this nation do NOT abide by their oaths in the performance of their official duties nor uphold the inherent unalienable rights secured to the people by and in the original organic Constitution and its Bill of Rights. No jurisdiction in this country, federal, state, county or local, upholds the Constitution, the inherent rights and due process guaranteed to the American people, but every one of them, without exception, upholds the tenets of communism and The Communist Manifesto.

Those Americans who have awakened through the un-Constitutional tyranny committed against them over the past four years, and those who awakened before this, are well aware of these disturbing facts. In order to restore America back to Constitutional governance and secure our Constitutional Republic, the treasonous- communist-domestic-enemy-traitors, who work for the owners and controllers of America must be lawfully removed from office, and true patriots must be put into the offices vacated by these traitors, so these patriots can restore true Constitutional governance.

For those who love America and are truly serious about taking her back from the domestic enemies who stole her well over 160 years ago, the following Affidavits can be very successful in lawfully removing the traitors from office. Remember, it is we, the people, who are the de jure government. We, the people, created the Constitution, thus, we, the people created government.

We are above government. Government exists to serve and benefit the people, and rightful government serves only with the consent of the people.

Those who operate the machinery of government only do so by and through the limited authority which we, the people, delegated to them, by and through the Constitution. Thus, whenever our public "servants" do anything that does not comply with the Constitution, they violate the Constitution, perjure their oaths thereto, and thus have no lawful authority, whatsoever, to conduct any duties of the offices they hold.

Whenever there is a Constitutional violation committed by anyone in public office, there is always a Constitutional remedy, and one of our favorite remedies is found in the self-executing, Sections 3 & 4, of the 14th Amendment to our national Constitution. We, the people have the lawful right, duty and authority to implement this remedy whenever un-Constitutional acts and/or actions are committed by anyone holding public office.

Keep these positions in mind, because they benefit the people: No public officer has the Constitutional authority, or any other form of valid, lawful authority, to violate, oppose and deny the very documents to which he swore or affirmed his oath, which is mandated upon all public officers pursuant to Article VI, Clauses 2 & 3 of the original national Constitution.

Any act or action committed by any public officer either supports and upholds the Constitution, or opposes and violates it. Any legislation that is not authorized by or contradicts the Constitution in any manner is not a "law", since pursuant to the referenced Clauses of Article VI, all laws must be made in pursuance of the Constitution.

As stated above, and as discovered by many Americans, politicians of all stripes do NOT uphold their oaths. The American people, by their silence, have consented to these un-Constitutional actions by traitors posing as "public servants", forever, and actually condone the fact that politicians do not abide by their oaths, commit un-Constitutional actions, and create un-Constitutional legislation, routinely. Remember, "government of right" serves with the consent of the people, so as long as the people tacitly "consent" to all of the perjury of oaths and un-Constitutional actions committed by these traitors, these acts and actions will not only continue, but escalate.

For truly serious, dedicated Americans who love their country and can see and feel the diabolical un-Constitutional actions being committed throughout our nation, these Affidavits present an excellent opportunity for the people to rein in the traitors and lawfully remove them from office. These serious Americans can approach an existing public officer or a candidate for office, along with a notary, if possible, or at least with two other people who can witness the officer's or candidate's signature. It is highly probable that few candidates/officers would sign this Affidavit, likely for the following reasons.

First and very unfortunately, for the people, all oath takers have sworn or affirmed oaths to the treasonous un-Constitutional 1871 corporate CONSTITUTION that eventually led to the corporate state which usurped legitimate, lawful governments throughout America. Most, if not all, of the public officers would balk at signing the Affidavit which requires allegiance to the original 1787 Constitution and its Bill of Rights. These traitors in office have taken oaths to an un-Constitutional corporate CONSTITUTION and its corporate state, and they are beholden to that corporate state and its anti-Constitutional agenda.

Secondly, there's a position in the Affidavit which requires office holders and candidates to not accept funds, gifts, emoluments or support of any type from lobbyists, vested interests and power forces, both domestic and foreign, dedicated to corruption, the destruction of America, her Constitution and her people. Those who have awakened over the past four years and learned the governing realities during that time realize that all governments are entirely corrupt, tyrannical, work against the people, and are bent on destroying our Constitutional Republic to usher in outright, despotic communism. According to the former Congresswoman from Georgia, Cynthia McKinney, and others, there are various "Jew" lobbyists and cartels that support candidates for office by supplying whatever funds and media exposure those candidates need to win, and their success rate is said to be about 98%.

This means that close to 100% of people in public office have taken money or bribes from these foreign interests, thus have supported the foreign interests' agenda, and obliterated the interests of America and the American people. Thus, it is highly likely that neither an office holder nor a candidate for office would sign the Affidavit, for this second reason.

While one may think that these possible refusals to sign are bad, the exact opposite is true and beneficial to the people. Refusal indicates that the officer or candidate has a separate agenda and objective that is pernicious to America and her people. Therefore, the serious Americans who presented the Affidavits and their support base could write Affidavits to these entities and cite the fact that they would not sign the Affidavit presented to them because of these two reasons. In other words, as stated, the officer or the candidate has his/her own separate agenda, exclusive of the American people and their interests, because he has his own interests and obligations to his "masters" to fulfill.

Thus, if an existing public officer, s/he must be lawfully removed from office, and if a candidate, must be prevented from attaining office. It is obvious that his/her allegiance is not to the American people and to the original amended Constitution of 1787, which upholds and secures our inherent rights and due process of law, but rather to an un-Constitutional corporate CONSTITUTION that usurped the power and authority of our original Constitution and the lawful governance it mandates.

Further, reluctance to sign could also indicate they have received funds, gifts and support from powerful vested interests, with their own nefarious agenda, aimed at the corruption and destruction of our precious American Republic. If America falls into the tyrannical communist hellhole, to never recover, then, the American people are at fault, and the rest of this world will soon follow suit.

In Eternal Truth and Freedom, Jack and Margy

We are offering the following Constitutional Affidavits:

For Governor – click here for PDF version

For Senator or Representative – click here for PDF version

For Candidate – click here for PDF version

Citizen Affidavit for Errant Officers

[Scroll to bottom for downloadable files]

American Citizens can take lawful action against any oath takers or public officers, based upon the un-Constitutional actions that these errant public officers have committed against Citizens and how the Citizens were harmed by those actions. Affidavits are documents which have lawful weight. An un-rebutted Affidavit stands as fact and truth before any court. American Jurisprudence 2d Affidavits, Section 20(a) states: “The court must accept an affidavit as true if it is uncontradicted by a counter affidavit or other evidentiary materials. If an affidavit is uncontradicted, the reviewing court must accept its contents as true.”

Below is a template of our standard Affidavit used for this purpose. This Affidavit is color coded to guide people in its use. The text in black is crucial. We and our people use it all the time, since it accomplishes several different objectives, thus, should never be changed or omitted. The old maxim, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" should be observed here.

The text in RED, under the BLUE text, on page 2, is where people would make their charges, claims, allegations and statements based upon the un-Constitutional actions of the public officer(s) that have harmed them. All public officers have taken oaths to the Constitution and must abide by their oaths in the performance of their official duties. NONE OF THEM DO! Therefore, it is up to the people to hold these public officers to the specific performance required of them, pursuant to the mandates contained in our Constitution. See: Article VI, Clauses 2 & 3. Citizens who write the Affidavit must know exactly what un-Constitutional actions were committed against them, which Constitutional amendment(s) and/or article(s) were violated by those un-Constitutional actions, how they and their rights were harmed by those actions, and must be able to specify all of this in direct, simply stated detail.

All of the charges and claims made against the public officer(s) must be based in truth, fact, valid law and evidence. If the Affidavit recipients disagree with any of the charges and claims made against them, then, pursuant to the lawful notification contained in the Affidavit, they must rebut these claims and charges, in kind, by their own sworn, notarized Affidavit, based in truth, fact, valid law and evidence, within the time limit the Affidavit writer [Affiant] provides, which is usually thirty [30] days. The lawful warning in the Affidavit states that if the Affidavit recipient fails to rebut, as specified, within the time limit allotted, then, he admits to and agrees with all of the charges and claims made in the Affidavit, fully binding upon him in any court, without his protest, objection and that of those who represent him. As stated, the paragraphs in black type are imperative.

Additional Affidavits are sent to the supervisory/oversight personnel of the public officer(s) to whom the original Affidavits were sent. The original Affidavit should be attached as an Exhibit to the Affidavits sent to the supervisory/oversight personnel. Please know that each public officer must be sent his/her own individual Affidavit, addressed to him or her. You cannot put the names of several public officers in the same Affidavit. The Affidavits to the supervisory/oversight personnel can state, in part, that "Someone under your watch and command has committed un-Constitutional actions which have harmed me. Now that you have been so informed, it is your duty, pursuant to your oath, to stop and correct these un-Constitutional actions. Further, the errant public officer has violated the Constitution, my inherent rights secured therein, and perjured his oath; therefore, has invoked the self-executing Sections 3 & 4 of the 14th Amendment, can no longer hold public office nor receive public funds, so must be removed from office forthwith. Lawfully, the offending public officer has already vacated his office, cannot perform any duties of that vacated office, and has forfeited all benefits thereof, including salary and pension. If you fail to stop and correct these un-Constitutional actions and fail to remove the offending public officer, then, pursuant to your oath, you are complicit with, condone, aid and abet his un-Constitutional actions and commit misprision of crime."

Be aware that these Affidavits are intended to be used by serious people who take serious lawful actions to stop and correct the serious criminal treason ongoing throughout America. They are not to be trifled with or tampered with or used foolishly. Long ago, America was seized by powerful banking interests, communists, wealthy power groups and vested interests, both domestic and foreign, who have no love for America, at all, and want to see her total destruction. All of America's governing bodies, federal, state, county and local, have been infiltrated by communists who are working to destroy America and her people. The idea behind the Affidavit is take America back from these traitors, lawfully remove them, and restore Constitutional governance throughout this land, at all levels.

Margy and I started this Constitutional process many, many decades ago. My objective, when, I, Jack, first began this work over 70 years ago, was to use the power and authority of the original Constitution expressed through a Constitutional Affidavit, to be used by the people, en masse, to lawfully remove the domestic-enemy-traitors and restore Constitutional governance.

When Margy began over 60 years ago, she had the same objective. However, the American people, as a society, then and now, had and have no interest in their own country, who owns it, who rules it, and how despotic it actually is. Their only interest was and is in personal matters from which they wanted to extricate themselves by using our Constitutional Methods. For decades, we helped people do this, expecting that they would eventually see the bigger picture and use the Affidavit process to restore Constitutional governance. Tragically, they never have.

A few people and a few groups have tried in various ways, but they never used the correct simple, but powerful, Constitutional Methods to achieve their objectives.

Margy and I are focused only on the greater objective, and this is the Project to Save America by lawfully ridding her of the criminal ruling domestic-enemy-traitors, and restoring her back to true Constitutional governance. If America is important to you, to your family, your children, your friends and your posterity, then, YOU must take lawful effective action, by and through the superior POWER AND AUTHORITY of the original Constitution and the Bill of Rights, to do this.

We will no longer help people in individual situations. Over the decades, we have helped many people in this nation win thousands of victories, in and out of court, at all levels, state, federal and local. That has come to an end.

You can use our methods to help yourselves, and you are welcome to do so, but given the dire state in which America now exists, OUR ONLY objective is the Project to Save America.

**********************
COPY BELOW & PASTE INTO YOUR DOCUMENT
*********************************
THEN CHANGE WORD COLORS TO ALL BLACK BEFORE SUBMITTING
**********************

Citizen Affidavit for Errant Officer – click here for DOC version

Citizen Affidavit for Errant Officer – click here for PDF version

Court Case Wins Samples

A Small Sampling of Court Orders Re: Cases Won I, Jack, started teaching the people how to use the power and authority of the original organic national Constitution for the united states of America, as amended with the Bill of Rights in 1791, against criminal, treasonous un-Constitutional governments over 70 years ago. Independently of me, Margy did the same thing over 60 years ago. If you have been following us, then you know that we began these efforts to encourage people to stand up for their rights against abuses by treasonous un-Constitutional governments, to lawfully remove un-Constitutional public officers from office, and restore Constitutional governance to America. Although that was our intention, no one was interested in restoring Constitutional rule to America. All of them just wanted to use our methods to resolve their personal problems. Many thousands of people have done exactly that, by winning victories, both in and out of court. While we were glad that they were able to win, using our methods, we were disappointed that they were not willing to "pay it forward" by helping others to learn and use our methods, which would have benefited America and her people. A handful did so, but, sadly, that was all.

Below is a very small sampling of a few of those wins. All of the thousands of victories were won by novices who had no knowledge of the political and governmental realities operative in America and had no experience in court. Through our methods and our training, they learned their inherent secured rights and the due process guaranteed by our Constitution, and prevailed against their opponents in an extremely corrupt corporate court system. As many of you know, courts in America are no longer lawful courts of justice, but rather, for-profit corporations, operating as administrative tribunals under the law of the sea, firmly opposed to the Constitution and the secured inherent rights and due process guaranteed to the people. Since basic novices, without experience, learned how to speak for themselves before the court, and win, then, you, reading this, can do the same thing.

Because of the un-Constitutional onslaught upon the people over the past four years by all forms of "government" in this country, Margy and I are committed to focusing only on The Save America Project intended to lawfully rid this nation of all ruling domestic enemies and restore our country to true Constitutional governance. This is our only objective. We will no longer help people with individual cases. You are welcome to use any and all of our methods to help yourself achieve personal success, and we encourage you to do so and urge you to help others, once you gain victory.

In Eternal Truth and Freedom, Jack and Margy Flynn

We are offering the following samples of Court Case Wins:

CITY OF LAS VEGAS v. MARGARET D. EDWARDS FLYNN 2-14-07 – click here for PDF version

CITY OF LAS VEGAS v. MARGARET EDWARDS-8-2-2020 - Animal Control – click here for PDF version

Dan O'Banion- 200 - minutes and order granting dismissal – click here for PDF version

Doug Order of Dismissal - U.S. District Court – click here for PDF version

John A. Gaskill - Order of Dismissal – click here for PDF version

Jose Mondragon - Order of Dismissal - 11-1-05 – click here for PDF version

Jose Mondragon-City of Las Vegas Request for Dismissal-10-22-05 – click here for PDF version

Kerry Dicharry - Order of Dismissal - 10-28-2005 – click here for PDF version

Lynden and Christine Boone - Order of Dismissal – click here for PDF version

METRIS v. EDWARDS ORDER 2-8-05 – click here for PDF version

METRIS v. EDWARDS ORDER 6-29-05 – click here for PDF version

Minah el bey Naa PA hearing results - charges dismissed – click here for PDF version

Myles Signed Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice File – click here for PDF version

STATE OF NEW MEXICO v. MARIO LUCERO 2-19-06 – click here for PDF version

STATE OF NEW MEXICO v. MARIO PEREZ 2-19-06 – click here for PDF version

Tom Hyland Order of Dismissal – click here for DOC version

Tom Olmsted - Order of Dismissal – click here for DOC version

Courts/Attorneys

Most of you have heard the phrase that one cannot practice law without a license. The Supreme Court has held that the practice of law is a Common Right, therefore NO ONE needs a “license” to practice law and “no one” includes the general public. No state issues a license to practice law, so this whole concept alleging that the people cannot deal in and use the law to protect themselves in any manner, including in the “courts”, is utter nonsense, false and completely un-Constitutional. The article below by an unknown author is very well worth reading and will shed light on many things about which close to 100% of the American people know nothing whatsoever.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATTORNEY LICENSE FRAUD

ATTORNEY'S LICENSE ??? ----AIN'T NO SUCH THING!!!

I. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;

A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239

B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)

II. The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:

1. ONLY authorizes, A. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.

B. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT; INFANTS; PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND. SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.

2. "CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE....

A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.

B. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!

III. The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!

A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"

B. The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."

1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.

2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.

C. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.

1. See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter.

2. As per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office!

IV. The State Bar is;

A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.

B. A ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;

C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.

D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing. ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!

E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas.

V. State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . .

Enrollment in the State Bar: "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW.

ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR AND LICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME. THE BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE!!!!!

It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of Texas and America. The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with treasonous goals in mind. They have accomplished 98% of their goals. The NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW. American People start the job for them...or before their "NEW WORLD ORDER" bosses, the International Bankers, gain the remaining 2%. Texas and American Lawyers should check historical records. They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in a power shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers and judges...for they always have proven themselves unworthy of any trust from either side!

"Woe unto you (A woe is a curse) Lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge; you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered..." Luke 11:52.

VI. The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION TRAITORS IN OUR MIDST:

The founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution and formed our government, made it very clear that this was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE country and all Citizens are to be equal under Law and not a private capitalistic monopoly or cartel as they had experienced in Europe.

Under free enterprise system, any Citizen, who was willing to risk his time and finances, can go into business. The public, with the freedom of choice, can patronize this business or decide they don't like the service or product and stay away; whereas, in a private or a capitalistic system, only the privileged elite can go into certain businesses or professions such as had been practiced in Europe for ages, making the public their CAPTIVE CUSTOMERS.

The EUROPEAN BANKERS and FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to change AMERICA to the same system that they had so they could take over this government too, and sent some British lawyers over here to organize an American Bar Association on the same order as the English Bar where only Lords can be Judges and determine who shall practice law.

In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.

VII. The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives. Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class.

This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws.

What is the real difference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white robes and fiery crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACK ROBES sitting on the bench? Aren't they as dictatorial as the KGB and the GESTAPO are accused of being? This has fulfilled Orwell's prediction for 1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT.

Various groups that have been lawfully stonewalled by the ABA and the courts suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish the Bar Association as there are 17 states where Citizens have the Right to do this by the voting process. If we can do this it will destroy, the power of the Bar in America with similar method they used to gain their power, state by state. Any Citizens, who live in one of these 17 states, can do this, and if not in one of these states, you can contribute to other states that can.

Who is going to run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR? The CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAW non-Union COUNSELORS. I would like to remind you that the Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list.

Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble. The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations.

They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves.

The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State.

Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar.

On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and National Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers.

This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state.

The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe."

The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, nowhere is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation.

Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.

We cannot hope to reclaim our Country if we continue to let that beast stay in our bed and in our homes. It is imperative that we remove this demon from its throne and put OUR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back into effect. We must stop worrying about what someone else will think, this is our country and we have foreign entities attempting to take control of us and our Nation.

These children of Satan have nothing good in store for any of us, and those who are ignorant enough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy, deserve just what they receive because they ask for it.

IX. MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY:

The small handful, that are good, must get on the right side and help us win our war, or they are not on our side. There can be no more sitting on the fence, people must decide which side they are on and fight.

Lawyers that claim to be on our side, and are later found out to be traitors, must be put to death as this is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations. Americans cannot win the war if they allow traitors to infiltrate our ranks and get away with it. The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly enemy, that cares nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them, you could be their next victim.

X. "TREASON"

LAWYER AND LAWYER-JUDGE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL: Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed in the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in the INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN (TREASON).

They have already taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar associations make a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY.

This necessitated and URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP). All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Article IV, Section 4, of the original, organic Constitution, the 13th Amendment and Article I, Section 26 of the Texas Constitution.

XI. The original, organic Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only.

All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens.

When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against ourselves.

In these Unconstitutional courts, foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) with a lot of hanky panky and hocus pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms.

The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders. ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution."

Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc.

In this Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the original, organic Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).

The original, organic Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.

XII. LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES:

Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the original, organic Constitution, and Article 1, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS.

When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY."

Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH.

These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws.

Since crime and treason are against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these TRAITORS, the lawyers.

As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS).

IXV. CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL:

As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "No." The lawyer --judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court."

Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers, as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.

District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRAND JURIES!

The original, organic Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the Original, organic Constitution, NOT interpret it.

Imagine hypothetically how stupid it would be if any constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution."

ORGANIZED CRIME never existed until the BAR ASSOCIATION took over OUR COURTS and OUR GOVERNMENT. Now crime is organized internationally, just as the Bar Associations are organized. Some of their international affiliations include but are not limited to THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSOCIATION; INTERNATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; WORLD PEACE THROUGH LAW CENTER; WORLD ASSEMBLY OF JUDGES: et al. This means that the Bar Associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY.

XV. Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS:

ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system" of hanky panky and hocus pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE. ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF "TREASON."

In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.

An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

In all elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS, never vote for a lawyer. Vote FOR NON-LAWYERS ONLY. If only lawyers are running for election to the same office, do NOT vote for any of them, as most are ALL ALIKE. All lawyers are programmed to be "TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES."

WALK SOFTLY AMERICANS AND CARRY A BIG STICK

Most importantly don't be afraid to use it. We are under vicious assault and we must make use of every resource we have, or give into their slavery. COPY AND SPREAD WIDELY, SEND COPIES TO THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES.

II Corinthians 5:5. For we walk by faith, not by sight.

Author Unknown

Prosecutorial Misconduct

The below-cited case unconstitutionally held that prosecutors may violate the constitutional rights of a defendant in prosecuting a case and the prosecutor may knowingly use false testimony and suppress evidence.

Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)

Imbler v. Pachtman No. 74-5435

Argued November 3, 1975

Decided March, 1976 424 U.S. 409

Syllabus

Petitioner, convicted of murder, unsuccessfully petitioned for state habeas corpus on the basis of respondent prosecuting attorney's revelation of newly discovered evidence, and charged that respondent had knowingly used false testimony and suppressed material evidence at petitioner's trial. Petitioner thereafter filed a federal habeas corpus petition based on the same allegations, and ultimately obtained his release. He then brought an action against respondent and others under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking damages for loss of liberty allegedly caused by unlawful prosecution, but the District Court held that respondent was immune from liability under § 1983, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Held: A state prosecuting attorney who, as here, acted within the scope of his duties in initiating and pursuing a criminal prosecution and in presenting the State's case, is absolutely immune from a civil suit for damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivations of the accused's constitutional rights. Pp. 424 U. S. 417-431.

Section 1983 is to be read in harmony with general principles of tort immunities and defenses, rather than in derogation of them. Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367. Pp. 424 U. S. 417.

(b) The same considerations of public policy that underlie the common law rule of absolute immunity of a prosecutor from a suit for malicious prosecution likewise dictate absolute immunity under § 1983. Although such immunity leaves the genuinely wronged criminal defendant without civil redress against a prosecutor whose malicious or dishonest action deprives him of liberty, the alternative of qualifying a prosecutor's immunity would disserve the broader public interest in that it would prevent the vigorous and fearless performance of the prosecutor's duty that is essential to the proper functioning of the criminal justice system and would often prejudice criminal defendants by skewing post-conviction judicial decisions that should be made with the sole purpose of insuring justice. Pp. 424 U. S. 420-428.

500 F.2d 1301, affirmed.

Page 424 U. S. 410

POWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER., C.J., and STEWART, BLACKMUN, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. WHITE, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which BRENNAN and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 424 U. S. 432. STEVENS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Davis v. Grusemeyer, 996 F. 2d 617:

This court held that it is okay for the prosecutor to violate the constitutional rights of the defendant and is immune from prosecution for so doing.

Myers v. Morris, 810 Fed 2d:

Prosecutor may file false charges without doing any investigation.

Jones v. Shankland, 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals, 800 F. 2d, F. 2b 1310, 1987:

Prosecutor may file charges outside of his jurisdiction. Prosecutor may KNOWINGLY offer perjured testimony and may suppress evidence, yet is immune for doing all of this.

Henzel v. Grettstein, 5th Circuit, Federal Court of Appeals, 608 F. 2d 654, 1979:

Prosecutor can suppress exculpatory evidence and be held immune for so doing.

Ashelman v. Pope, 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals, 793 E. 2d at 1072, 1986:

The prosecutor is immune from lawsuits for conspiring with the judge to determine the outcome of the proceedings, in other words, to predetermine the outcome.

Norton v. Liddell, 10th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, 620 F. 2d, p. 1375, 1980:

The prosecutor may KNOWINGLY file charges against an innocent person for crimes that never occurred.

Pinder v. Johnson, 4th Circuit Court, 33 F. 3rd, p. 368-372, 1994:

The court held that, in general, the public has no constitutional right to be protected from harm inflicted by third parties. This means that the police, who are paid by the public, have no duty to protect the public.

Ketchum v. Alameida County, 811 F. 2d, 1243, 1989 & Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F. 2d, 616, [The district court, 486 F.Supp. 742 granted summary judgment for all defendants and ordered the complaint dismissed. With regard to the private defendants, the basis for the court's action was an affidavit of a qualified expert which states that they used all due professional care in their treatment of Vanda. The plaintiff's failure to offer any counter affidavit shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding these defendants' due care.]

The ruling in Bowers upheld Ketchum, namely the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties and does not require the state to provide services to the people.

”There is a constitutional right not to be murdered by a state officer, for the state violates the Fourteenth Amendment when its officer, acting under color of state law, deprives a person of life without due process of law.

Brazier v. Cherry, 293 F.2d 401, 404-05 (5th Cir. 1961).

But there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties; it tells the state to let people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order.”

ByPass the Banks - Best Seller!

ORDER NOW on AMAZON!

ORDER NOW on BARNES & NOBLE!